John is right, this works...

Regards,

Christian Schneider
Enterprise Service Specialist

4-tune GmbH
Sägereistrasse 29
CH-8152 Glattbrugg

http://www.4-tune.ch
christian.schnei...@4-tune.ch

Office ZH: +41 (0)44 818 02 03
Office SG: +41 (0)71 930 07 00
Mobile:    +41 (0)79 418 4542
Fax:               +41 (0)71 930 0701



Am 26.02.2009 um 16:36 schrieb John O'Mahony:

> Mike
> you can disable the alarm appearing on the port and have the alarm  
> on the server instead by setting the following attributes for the port
>
> PollPortStatus - FALSE
> ok_to_poll - FALSE
> AlarmOnLinkDownTrap - Never (0)
> AssertLinkDownAlarm - FALSE
> GeneratePortStatusAlarms - FALSE
>
> You may not need them all set, I think the key one is  
> AssertLinkDownAlarm.
>
> Regards, John
>
> From: Mahdal Ales [mailto:ales.mah...@anect.com]
> Sent: 26 February 2009 07:50
> To: spectrum
> Subject: RE: [spectrum] Bad Link Detected
>
> Mike,
>
> Have you checked the „Configuring Port Fault Correlation“ setup,  
> yet? There is a special chapter about various approaches how  
> Spectrum can treat these situations. I am pretty sure you will find  
> what you need to change in order to have alarm presented as primary  
> one on the server instead on the port on the switch.
> Go to to “Monitoring IT Infrastructure Guide” and find chapter I  
> mentioned above.
>
> Have a fun with testing …;}
>
> Ales
>
>
>
>
> Aleš Mahdal
> Consultant, Network & Applications Monitoring & Management
>
> <anect-logo-mail.png>
> ANECT a.s. | Antala Staška 2027/79, 140 00 Praha 4 | Czech Republic
> T +420 271 100 100 | F +420 271 100 101 | M +420 724 427 400
> ales.mah...@anect.com
> www.anect.com
>
> Pamatujte na životní prostředí, než vytisknete tento email
> Please consider the environment before printing this email
> From: Friedman, Mike [mailto:mike.fried...@orbitz.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:27 PM
> To: spectrum
> Subject: [spectrum] Bad Link Detected
>
> I was wondering if anyone knows if it’s possible to have the bad  
> link detected alarms on a switch be treated as the suppressed alarm  
> when a server goes down and the server itself be the primary alarm.   
> As it stands right now if a server gets shutdown or stops responding  
> we see the Bad link alarm and the alarm for the server goes into  
> suppressed mode and is listed as an impact.  Ideally the server  
> should be the primary alarming device instead of the switch port.
>
> This may be very simple and I have just missed it in the  
> documentation, so any recommendations are appreciated.
>
> Michael R. Friedman
> Network Engineer
> Network Engineering | Orbitz Worldwide
>
>
>
> --To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to lists...@unc.edu with  
> the body: unsubscribe spectrum ales.mah...@anect.com
>
> --To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to lists...@unc.edu with  
> the body: unsubscribe spectrumj.omah...@darasoft.com
>
> --To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to lists...@unc.edu with  
> the body: unsubscribe spectrumchristian.schnei...@4-tune.ch


---
To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to lists...@unc.edu with the body: 
unsubscribe spectrum arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to