Hello Jon, I think they have a sizeable investment in Netcool. I was thinking the same thing. It really does not make sense to have both products, but you never know how these two apps came together. Now they have to live with them both and make them behave and play together nicely.
Calvin On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Jon Whitehouse < [email protected]> wrote: > Why in the world keep netcool? Spectrum does a much better job… is there > a reason for keeping netcool? > > > > --- > *Jon Whitehouse* > *Systems Engineer - IT, Server Support* > *MS 5221* > *1800 W. Center Street* > *Warsaw, IN 46580* > *(574) 371-8684* > *(574) 377-2829 (cell)* > *[email protected]* <[email protected]> > > *From:* Calvin Lane [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2009 4:44 PM > *To:* spectrum > *Subject:* [spectrum] Is this failover scenario feasible? > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I have a customer that wants to design a failover/fault tolerant > soluction such that all SPECTRUM data/events/alarms are funnelled through > one primary SpectroServer that forwards alarms over to a Netcool object > server. Please refer to the attached diagram and let me know if this > conceptual design is feasible. Thanks. > > > > [email protected] > > - --To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with > the body: unsubscribe spectrum [email protected] > > > --- To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe spectrum [email protected]
