Our systems that are running H04 are all RHEL 5 VMs. There are five total landscapes (one MLS/TD/SBGW landscape, and four with actual models), each with two VMs. All 10 SS servers have the equivalent of 2 Xeon CPUs at 2.9GHz, 6GB of RAM, and 27GB disk. We also have three plain OC servers, one SRM OC server, and one BOXI server.
Landscapes vary between 1400 and 2100 models each. We total around 30 traps/sec and very few syslogs across the environment. The only clean install we've done is 9.0; we've been upgrading ever since. HTH, Jim On 5/26/11 10:46 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It would be nice to get some environmental detail on these issues > > Operating System > Hardware or VM > Number of Models > Upgraded SSDB vs a clean install > Trap/Syslog load > > > We are getting ready to build out our dev environment with H04 under RH5 > > Dan Ellsweig > > Enterprise Management Systems > Avon Products > 1 Avon Plaza > Rye, NY 10830 > > 914-935-2723 > > > > > James Garthek > <james.garthek@gm > ail.com> To > "spectrum" > 05/26/2011 01:39 <[email protected]> > PM cc > spectrum > <[email protected]> > Please respond to Subject > James Garthek Re: [spectrum] H04 experiences > <james.garthek@gm (WAS: Problems with Spectrum 9.2 > ail.com> H03) > > > > > > > > > > > Linux > I'm planning to do some troubleshooting, but I hadn't time yet. > > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Diego Pereyra > <[email protected]> wrote: >> under wich operating system ?? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Garthek [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thu 26/05/2011 14:24 >> To: spectrum >> Subject: Re: [spectrum] H04 experiences (WAS: Problems with Spectrum 9.2 > H03) >> >> Hi, >> >> After installing H04, our SpectroServer was working 5 minutes. After >> that, it crashed!!! (no EEM integration, no fault tolerant) >> >> Now, working with H03 again. >> >> James. >> >> >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:58 PM, David Game <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> I should have added that not everyone will be affected by the issues > found >>> but we had stability problems with it. >>> >>> >>> >>> We're not using EEM either but had 3 crashes on our dev server in the > space >>> of 4-5 days. My colleague testing it found other issues too (which I > can't >>> recall many of right now) but for CA to pull it from release means there >>> must have been some major issues with it for various other people as > well. >>> I'm holding off H04 on our main production systems until we get a stable >>> release. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Pfleger, Jim [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: 26 May 2011 17:55 >>> To: David Game >>> Cc: Spectrum users >>> Subject: Re: [spectrum] H04 experiences (WAS: Problems with Spectrum 9.2 >>> H03) >>> >>> >>> >>> My understanding from CA is that it was pulled because it caused a > problem >>> in the Spectrum<->EEM integration, which we're not using. Regardless, > we're >>> stuck on H04 since hotfixes do not contain a rollback mechanism like > patches >>> do. We're putting in an ER for this. >>> >>> >>> On 5/26/11 9:49 AM, "David Game" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Jim - HF04 has been pulled due to an inordinate number of bugs! If you > can >>> roll back to H03 until HF04 is "fixed" I'd strongly advise it. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Pfleger, Jim [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: 26 May 2011 16:09 >>> To: spectrum >>> Subject: [spectrum] H04 experiences (WAS: Problems with Spectrum 9.2 > H03) >>> >>> As promised, here's an update on the issues from my previous email - all >>> four were addressed in H04. I'm awaiting final confirmation from our >>> reporting guru on the SRM issue, but I believe it's been resolved. Also, >>> we're occasionally getting duplicate notifications again, but the debug >>> looks different from the last time this happened, so we're treating it > as a >>> separate issue. >>> >>> Because of these fixes (and others) we installed H04 as soon as it was >>> available, so I can provide some early feedback. >>> >>> We've found two events (so far) that are no longer logged to the events >>> database (0x1010a and 0x1010d, for model attr changes). We're going to > now >>> conduct a full audit of what other undocumented event changes came with > H04. >>> It seems that our failover servers are sometimes being started as root >>> instead of ssadmin, which is mangling file permissions. The problem > started >>> after H04, but it's not clear why yet, partly because it's only > happening on >>> some of our failover servers. >>> The negative alarm counts issue citied in the release notes is not >>> (completely) fixed, and we already have a new ticket open on it. >>> >>> That's all I have so far on H04. When I have anything else of note, I'll >>> definitely share it with the group. >>> >>> HTH, >>> Jim >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >> --- >> To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with the > body: unsubscribe spectrum [email protected] >> >> >> > > --- > To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with the body: > unsubscribe spectrum [email protected] > > > > --- > To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with the body: > unsubscribe spectrum [email protected] --- To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe spectrum [email protected]
