Hello,

Now I have this problem I think this is a important handicap. The
manufacturers go to future to multicore, multithread, contrary to the
SpectroServer features that you have commented. I´ll try to explain to
the client the need to go to a distributed enviroment if we want
continue growing.

Thank you for you help!

Susana

2011/10/21 Christian Schneider <[email protected]>:
> Hi Susana,
> We have one with 250k models as well and I agree, this should be lowered.
> The problem is that spectrum (the SS) is not made for usage of multiple
> processes/threads. Therefor it run's on one single CPU or core and this is
> the reason why it is better to have less cores but highest possible
> frequency to get the maximum speed of the SpectroServer.
> Just to complete the picture, of course, the other processes like
> OneClick-Tomcat or ArchMgr may run on a other core/CPU than the SS..
> Hope this brings some light into your question..
> Regards,
> --
>
> Christian Schneider
> Enterprise Service Specialist
> 4-tune GmbH
> Sägereistrasse 29
> CH - 8152 Glattbrugg
> web:     http://www.4-tune.ch
> e-mail:  [email protected]
> Office SG:       +41 (0)71 930 07 00
> Mobile:    +41 (0)79 418 4542
> Fax:    +41 (0)71 930 0701
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 21.10.2011 um 09:15 schrieb susana jimenez:
>
> Two weeks ago we had a case with CA' support which the asked me that
> send they the health inform. They recommended me install a Distributed
> SpectroServer to reduce the work of SpectroServer. This is our
> environment:
>
> SpectroServer: A Sun Server with Solaris10; 72Gb HDD, 16 cores and 8Gb Ram.
> OneClick1  A Sun Server with Solaris10; 150 Gb HDD, 16 cores and 6Gb Ram
> OneClick2  A Sun Server with Solaris10; 150 Gb HDD, 16 cores and 6Gb Ram
>
> We have at least 250.000 models, most of them switches or routers with
> ports, applications, and traps management to Spectrum. The CPU on the
> three Servers always run below of 10%, and no problems of memory. But,
> the health inform and CA says that our machine is overload; Really, CA
> say that the number of max. Models supported depends a lot of things,
> but our SpectroServer is 100%. I read somewhere that “One workstation
> managing fewer than 1000 devices/average 24 ports on each device”.
>
> There is something that I don’t understand, if the SS is overload, why
> it not uses the hardware resources free? What good have a very
> powerful server if only a 10% will be use?
>
> Regards!!
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with the body:
> unsubscribe spectrum [email protected]
>
>

---
To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] with the body: 
unsubscribe spectrum [email protected]

Reply via email to