On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Brett, >> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >> > That's what I'm trying to establish; how much have they diverged and if >> > I'm >> > looking in the proper place. >> >> bm_mako.py is not from Unladen Swallow; that's why it is in >> pypy/benchmarks/own/. In case of doubts, check it in the history of >> Hg. The PyPy version was added from virhilo, which seems to be the >> name of his author, on 2010-12-21, and was not changed at all since >> then. > > > OK. Maciej has always told me that a problem with the Unladen benchmarks was > that some of them had artificial loop unrolling, etc., so I had assumed you > had simply fixed those instances instead of creating entirely new > benchmarks.
No we did not use those benchmarks. Those were mostly completely artificial microbenchmarks (call, call_method etc.). We decided we're not really that interested in microbenchmarks. > >> >> >> Hg tells me that there was no change at all in the 'unladen_swallow' >> subdirectory, apart from 'unladen_swallow/perf.py' and adding some >> __init__.py somewhere. So at least these benchmarks did not receive >> any pypy-specific adapatations. If there are divergences, they come >> from changes done to the unladen-swallow benchmark suite after PyPy >> copied it on 2010-01-15. > > > I know that directory wasn't changed, but I also noticed that some > benchmarks had the same name, which is why I thought they were forked > versions of the same-named Unladen benchmarks. Not if they're in own/ directory. Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ Speed mailing list Speed@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed
