On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Antoine's right on this one - just use and redistribute the upstream >> >> components under their existing licenses. CPython itself is different >> >> because the PSF has chosen to reserve relicensing privileges for that, >> >> which >> >> requires the extra permissions granted in the contributor agreement. >> > >> > >> > But I'm talking about the benchmarks themselves, not the wholesale >> > inclusion >> > of Mako, etc. (which I am not worried about since the code in the >> > dependencies is not edited). Can we move the PyPy benchmarks themselves >> > (e.g. bm_mako.py that PyPy has) over to the PSF benchmarks without >> > getting >> > contributor agreements. >> >> The PyPy team need to put a clear license notice (similar to the one >> in the main pypy repo) on their benchmarks repo. But yes, I believe >> you're right that copying that code as it stands would technically be >> a copyright violation, even if the PyPy team intend for it to be >> allowed. >> >> If you're really concerned, check with Van first, but otherwise I'd >> just file a bug with the PyPy folks requesting that they clarify the >> licensing by adding a LICENSE file and in the meantime assume they >> intended for it to be covered by the MIT license, just like PyPy >> itself. >> >> The PSF license is necessary for CPython because of the long and >> complicated history of that code base. We can use simpler licenses for >> other stuff (like the benchmark suite) and just run with license in = >> license out rather than preserving the right for the PSF to change the >> license. >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> >> -- >> Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia >> _______________________________________________ >> Speed mailing list >> Speed@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed > > > First, I believe all the unalden swallow stuff (including the runner) is > under the PSF licence, though you'd have to check the repo for a license > file or bug Jeffrey and Collin. Someone (fijal) will add an MIT license for > our half of the repo. > > > Alex
Done. PyPy benchmarks are MIT _______________________________________________ Speed mailing list Speed@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed
