On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:47:31 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > I didn't realize when reading this discussion that hexiom2 was *that*
> > slow. I don't think a benchmark taking 100+ seconds to run *in fast
> > mode* has a place in the benchmark suite. PyPy can maintain their own
> > benchmarks in their source tree, like CPython does.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> 
> I strongly disagree. There are quite a few slow benchmarks that are
> very useful, like pypy translation toolchain. How about you skip this
> one in fast mode?

The problem is that the benchmark suite is normally runnable in
interactive mode. A very long-running benchmark isn't a good fit for
that model.
Yes, I guess we could at least skip it in fast mode.

Regards

Antoine.


-- 
Software development and contracting: http://pro.pitrou.net


_______________________________________________
Speed mailing list
Speed@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed

Reply via email to