> For more benchmarks, see attached deadcode1.log and deadcode2.log: > results of the CPython benchmark to compare deadcode1 VS reference, > and deadcode2 VS reference run on my desktop PC (perf.py --fast & CPU > isolation). Again, deadcode1 looks slower in most cases, whereas > deadcode2 looks faster in most cases, whereas the difference is still > dead code...
Sorry, I forgot to attach these two files. They are now attached to this new email. Victor
deadcode1.log
Description: application/binary
deadcode2.log
Description: application/binary
_______________________________________________ Speed mailing list Speed@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed
