On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-07-29 20:51 GMT+02:00 Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com>: >> I think rather than using virtual environments which aren't truly >> supported by <3.3 anyway, ... > > What do you mean? I'm building and destroying dozens of venv everyday > at work using tox on Python 2.7. The virtualenv command works well, > no? Do you have issues with it?
Not in particular, just that 3.3+ have official support for venvs whereas virtualenv is a bit of a hack by necessity. However, the second point is the real reason I'd rather avoid venvs for this: to make sure that the interpreters actually use the same exact code, so that there can't be any setup.py shenanigans that do things differently between versions/implementations. -- Zach _______________________________________________ Speed mailing list Speed@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed
