On 13 April 2017 at 02:15, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-04-12 10:52 GMT+02:00 Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com>: >> I'm running benchmarks with this option. Once results will be ready, I >> will remove the old 2.7 result to replace it with the new one. > > Done. speed.python.org now uses UCS-4 on Python 2.7. Is it better now?
Thanks! > Previous JSON file: > https://github.com/haypo/performance_results/raw/master/2017-03-31-cpython/2017-04-03_16-11-2.7-23d6eb656ec2.json.gz > > New JSON file: > https://github.com/haypo/performance_results/raw/master/2017-04-12-cpython/2017-04-10_17-27-2.7-e0cba5b45a5c.json.gz > > I see small performance differences, but they don't seem to be related > to UTF-16 => UCS-4, but more random noise. Given that lack of divergence and the known Unicode correctness problems in narrow builds, I guess it doesn't make much sense to invest time in benchmarking both of them. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Speed mailing list Speed@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed
