Ok. So would you be ok to simply drop this benchmark? Or does anyone need it?
http://pyperformance.readthedocs.io/benchmarks.html#django-template --- Use the Django template system to build a 150x150-cell HTML table. Use Context and Template classes of the django.template module. --- Other template benchmarks: * http://pyperformance.readthedocs.io/benchmarks.html#chameleon * http://pyperformance.readthedocs.io/benchmarks.html#genshi * http://pyperformance.readthedocs.io/benchmarks.html#mako Victor 2018-01-09 17:46 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:39:33 +0100 > Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 2018-01-09 16:42 GMT+01:00 INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com>: >> > We already compare different libraries. For example, pickle is very >> > different >> > between Python 2.7 and 3.6. >> > Even though it's not good for comparing interpreter performance, it's good >> > for people comparing Python 2 and 3. >> > >> > If Django 2.0 on Python 3.7 is much faster than Django 1.11 on Python 2.7, >> > it's nice carrot for people moving forward. >> >> I agree. Antoine: what do you think? > > I disagree. pickle is an integral part of Python, it's versioned > *with* Python. Django is not and it's misleading to compare results > obtained using two differents of it. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Speed mailing list > Speed@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed _______________________________________________ Speed mailing list Speed@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/speed
