That's exacly what I needed to be told. MUM' with me is lightening fast now after your advice :)
I've abandoned learning CLL at the moment and cut to the orientation of the last six edges. (OLSE?) I've found I can do "http://grrroux.free.fr/method/s4_m2a_3.gif"; faster with (MUM') U' (MUM') that what I was doing before. I think I'll optimise the sequences for all the orientations and opposites to them tonight. This should knock 1-2 seconds off my times :) Oh, I got a 19.20 with Roux as a single solve record :) Go me. ~Thom --- In [email protected], "Gilles Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yeah, I can learn to do that, but M on it own is bloody hard. > > > > M is tough, it's useless to optimize it alone, you should consider > optimizations of the sequences where it appears. > > If you need to do MUM' fast for example, just try l(L'UM') or > R(r'UM'). I don't like to try to write fingertricks, because in fact > it starts with (l/2)(R/2). > (r'UM) is so fast, it looks like 1 move. > > Gilles. > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
![http://grrroux.free.fr/method/s4_m2a_3.gif"](http://grrroux.free.fr/method/s4_m2a_3.gif"){kind=link}