I just took an average. Cubes solved in 22s-40s. 15s inspection.
Important: No take-backs.
39 42 36 (46) 44 (33) 46 37 44 37 43 42 --> 41 moves (it may rise to
44, and my best is 38)
43 is still valid, with a 30s time limit.

Good night,

Gilles.



--- In [email protected], "Stefan Pochmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm...
> 
> Gilles is even better :-)
> http://grrroux.free.fr/method/Miscellaneous.html
> 
> If I remember correctly, David takes about 30 seconds, and with that 
> speed, Gilles says he averages 43 moves. And I think he wrote that 
> page a while ago, maybe he has improved further in the meantime?
> 
> Cheers!
> Stefan
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Duncan Dicks" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi David,
> > Those are pretty amazing move numbers for a speedcubing strategy!  
> What 
> > method do you use that is so much more efficient than Fridrich?  I 
> know with 
> > fewest move methods one can get much lower but if this is a 
> speedsolving 
> > method then it seem to be lower than just about anything I've heard 
> of.  The 
> > benefit of L2L is there are fewer algorithms to learn, and so also a 
> less 
> > onerous recognition phase, than Fridrich - is the number of 
> algorithms a 
> > problem with your method?  i'd love to hear more.
> > 
> > Best wishes
> > 
> > Duncan
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "d_j_salvia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 1:37 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Speed cubing group] L2L2 solves
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi Duncan,
> > >
> > > In the old days I averaged somewhere between 36 and 54 moves, with
> > > occasional forays above and below that, but I rarely tried to 
> improve
> > > solely on the basis of fewer moves.
> > >
> > > You got me wondering about how many moves it takes me now. So I 
> did 16
> > > solves: 46, 44, 41, 38, 46, 44, 47, 46, 48, 46, 45, 35, 48, 49, 
> 46, 45.
> > >
> > > I know I can look ahead better and understand more than I'm do 
> now.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > David J
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Duncan Dicks"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi All
> > >> Just a progress update.  I am pretty much solving full time with 
> my
> > > L2L2
> > >> strategy now.  Although my times are still slower until I get 
> faster
> > > at the
> > >> recognition/selection process, my average number of moves per 
> solve
> > > is a lot
> > >> less now.  I did 10 solves recently at 52-53 moves which is 
> probably
> > > close
> > >> to the right figure.  Number of moves is mostly reliant on 
> getting
> > > the cross
> > >> plus two corners in as few moves as possible - or if you were to
> > > choose a
> > >> different approach for the start - F2L less two middle edges.  
> There
> > > may
> > >> still be room for improvement in this - I've been thinking of
> > > spending some
> > >> time on Chris' X-cross work to see if anything is applicable.  
> Also
> > > Paul
> > >> Nixon has tried starting with the Petrus 3x2x2 but got bogged 
> down.
> > > I don't
> > >> know this but it may offer another way to start L2L solves.  Any
> > > comments or
> > >> suggestions more than welcome :)
> > >>
> > >> Duncan
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to