Hello guys, I've always been a very crap algorithms performer. Even if my best average is 17.92, I still average over 7 seconds for the LL (sometimes over 8 or 9 !). I've timed all my PLL algorithms and took averages. The result is 3.28 seconds (for PLL only) (weighted average, knowing that the solved case time is 0 seconds). All my PLL were timed the same way : hands on the stackmat, sitting at a table.
Here are the full results : http://www.belgiancubes.be/LL_average.pdf I'm first going to work on the over4 seconds cases, and the ones that add more than 0.2 seconds to the average. This will take me to a 3.16 average for PLL, and then I'll take down all my over3.5 and over 0.17 weighted, and so on. My goal is 2.5 seconds. Afterwards, I'll do the same for OLL. I thought I would share this with you if any of you is in the same case as I am. I think that after this work I should be able to have a 16 seconds average. :D (then I'll work again on F2L also). Happy New Year ! Gilles. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
