I use this alg for your first case:
F R U' R' U R U2' R' U' R U R' U' F'
It's only 14 moves and I can also average under 2.5 seconds no problem.
For your second case, what exactly is it supposed to look like?
Leyan
Mike Bennett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago, I remember a few people bringing up several of their
> worst COLL cases, and many people had similar trouble algs.
>
> Here is a new one I found tonight that's very fast despite being so
> long. Try it. Set up the cube with the inverse.
>
> (L'U')(LU'L'U)*2 (LU'L'U')(RU')(LUR')
>
> 19 moves, but after only a little bit of practice, I'm already under
> 2.5 seconds on average with it. I suppose everyone else will probably
> want it in (mostly) RU, so here it is:
>
> (RU)(R'URU')*2 (R'URU)(L'U)(R'U'L)
>
> Also, try as I might, I still can't find a better alg for this case or
> its mirror(inverse to scramble):
>
> (LU')(R'U)(LU'R)U'(RUR'URU2R')
>
> For that and the mirror, I average around 2.75, but I've never found a
> better alg for it. Does anyone else use this?
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
