I think when you get the hang of it, but have trouble in some cases, there's nothing wrong with looking up the algorithms. As you make sure you understand how the F2L moves work.
- Joël. --- In [email protected], David Pritts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am starting to get the hang of intuitive F2L! (it sorta just started to click after i struggled through it, looking at the four "algorithms" repeatedly). Now I can solve 3 corners with this method without too much trouble, although it's still not fast. My old method is still MUCH faster than this. > > Question: Generally I have some difficulty inserting the last pair into the F2L. Tips? How do I form one of the "fundamental F2L cases" when I am so limited in my ability to move the pieces around? > > I have been able to do it before, but the last one frequently takes a long time... I am realy unable to plan it out (although I am starting to get better at actually planning out the first 3, rather than just moving rnadomly aroudn until I recognize a pattern), and I sort of just play with it for a while. Will I just get better at this? How long will I have to use F2L until I get "relatively fast" at it (ie, less than 45 seconds in my case) > > thanks > > David > > > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
