I looked at this scramble to see fewest moves, I am still relatively a new speedcuber, so I know there is probably a better solution. *I do Petrus F2L, then OLL/PLL*
Here is my 32 move solution, my average solution is about 55moves L U2 R2 U' F' L' F U2 L U2 L U2 L U' L' y R2 D R' U2 R D' R' U2 R' U L2 U y' M U2 M' U F2 --- In [email protected], "ericdstalter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After doing that scramble I got a 31.83s solve, my second attempt > was a 28.33(kinda a new PB -but it was the second solve on the same > scramble,don't really count) > > My 2x2x3 block was 5 moves [x L F2 L2 R2 F2], I could not remember > the rest of my solve. > > Great scramble > > ERic > > --- In [email protected], teemu_tiinanen > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Let me first tell something about myself: my best average of 10 is > > slightly under 25 secs, my best single solve without luck is 17.84 > and > > my best lucky solve is around 15 secs. Anyway, today I had this > awesome > > scramble generated by JNetCube: U' D B2 D' B2 D' F2 D2 B2 F' L' R > U' F' > > R' U R' L U B' R2 B F L2 F2, and I managed to solve it in 11.41 > secs! > > The reconstructed solve is: double x-cross: L U2 R2 U L2, 3rd > pair: U2 > > y' R U R' U R U' R', 4th pair: L' U' L, OLL: F R U' R' U' R U R' > F', > > PLL: y2 R2 U'R' U' R U R U R U' R. I think this isn't technically > a > > lucky solve, but do you find the F2L too lucky, even though I saw > the > > double x-cross during the inspection time? I managed to take this > on > > video with my digital camera, since I tape most of my solves just > in > > case I make a new record. Here is the video: > > http://koti.mbnet.fi/~stini/TT_11.41.avi > > > > However, try that scramble :) > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
