No, I do live in canada, but I don't get up too too early...I do have 
school you know...actually I am in my first period class right now...

Craig

--- In [email protected], Rune Wesström 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I totally agree with you.
> PS. You are living in Canada, arn´t you? You must get up very early 
in the morning(s)?
> R
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Craig Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:30 PM
> Subject: [Speed cubing group] The Olden Days (was Re: Dallas Cubers)
> 
> 
> > Hey,
> > 
> > If you check the world records there is a separate record for No-
> > inspection...Some people (mainly non-cubers) think the inspection 
is 
> > stupid for 1 of 2 reasons...1:They think it is cheating or 2:The 
> > don't see what you are looking for...So I think the inspection is 
a 
> > good thing and if you are hosting a competition and want to do a 
> > round with no-inspection then go ahead...the Swedish Competitions 
> > always have them...these competitions probably have the most 
events 
> > but it works cuz they have fewer people...
> > 
> > Craig
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "andro_what" 
> > <andro_what@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree about the no pre-inspection.  Everyone knows a large 
part 
> > of 
> > > getting your times down is fast recognition or pre-recognition 
> > during 
> > > the solve to minimize the times between algorithms, but we 
> > currently 
> > > let everyone have 15 seconds to pre-inspect (isn't that like 
> > > subtracting a portion of the overall solve time).  
> > > 
> > > My best single solve, "non-lucky" was 24 sec back in 
1983...just 
> > > wondering what it would have been with pre-inspection.
> > > 
> > > Anyone have thoughts on pre-inspection vs no pre-inspection?
> > > 
> > > > Take the final round competitors, put them through their 5 
timing 
> > > > runs, then while you're tabulating results, put them in 
a "drag 
> > > race": 
> > > > One scramble, no pre-inspection, all start at the same time, 
> > first 
> > > > solve wins. It could be a real crowd pleaser!
> > > 
> > > I also like the idea of a head to head, "exibition" for the 
final 
> > > round competitors, as a time filler...it was more exciting for 
the 
> > > spectators back then...
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Jeff Soesbe" 
> > > <yeff@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm - maybe we have a new event for future competitions? 
> > > > 
> > > > Take the final round competitors, put them through their 5 
timing 
> > > > runs, then while you're tabulating results, put them in 
a "drag 
> > > race": 
> > > > One scramble, no pre-inspection, all start at the same time, 
> > first 
> > > > solve wins. It could be a real crowd pleaser!
> > > > 
> > > > yeff
> > > > 
> > > > ps - no, not the other kind of "drag" race. Though, now that 
you 
> > > > mention it, didn't they get Tyson in a dress at some point 
during 
> > > > BATG2?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], 
christopher_pelley 
> > > > 
> > > > > > solve you were ecstatic. Rubik's Cube contests were "1 
run, 
> > no 
> > > pre-
> > > > > > inspection, everyone goes at once, drag race" 
competitions 
> > and 
> > > the 
> > > > > > winners had times like 68 seconds.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I actually liked this format.  There's something more 
dramatic 
> > > about 
> > > > > watching every solver start simultaneously.  I think they 
even 
> > > > > played music.  It's also obvious who wins (whoever puts 
their 
> > > solved 
> > > > > cube down first).  For the competitor, it adds an element 
of 
> > > > > excitement because you are truly "racing" instead of just 
> > setting 
> > > > > times.
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to