--- In [email protected], Rune Wesström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don´t know very much in life and of course I didn´t know that I >had to send you an email to vote. I simply cast my vote there, where >five names are shown. I just now checked, If I had voted (skleros, >you know), by voting once more and got the answer: "you cannot vote >repeatly". So what did I wrong? Should I have sent you an email with >a detailed argumentation why voting on mr Z?
I have no idea what you're trying to ask here; sorry :) I have professionals decoding the message right now however. > The most influential cuber? Long ago I taught a girl to assamble >the cube. In Her eyes *I* am the most influential cuber in the world. That is excellent! >(Like the boy here, who voted on mr X, "for he learnt cubing from >his video". If "the most influential cuber" is chosen after such >argumentations, the poll is not only "harmless" but even funny and >as such, has the right to be laughed at). You have just conceded that this poll is indeed harmless. Very good! Then why the fixation on it? As far as the laughter goes; your antics alone provide comic relief you sly dog! -Richard > R > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "richy_jr_2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:23 AM > Subject: [Speed cubing group] Re: Most Influential Cuber > > > Rune, > > I did not receive an email from you voting for someone, but you care > enough to post challenging a relatively harmless poll? Perhaps the > most influential cuber in your eyes -- is you :P > > Surely this effort can be used for more productive things. > > Happy Cubing, > > -Richard > > --- In [email protected], Rune Wesström > <rune.wesstrom@> wrote: > > > > Up till now there are 86 votes. Most of the community? > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Gunnar Krig" <gunkr520@> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 7:55 PM > > Subject: [Speed cubing group] Re: Most Influential Cuber > > > > > > Hej Rune! > > > > Maybe you already know this! Everybody here was invited to > > nominate "their" most influential cuber, so I think most of the > > community have their nominee in the poll, and therefore think the > > nomination is OK. > > > > /Gunnar > > > > --- In [email protected], Rune Wesström > > <rune.wesstrom@> wrote: > > > > > > Why such a poll? The only result is that 25% will find the > > nomination correct, 75% wrong. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "GameOfDeath2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:37 PM > > > Subject: [Speed cubing group] Re: Most Influential Cuber > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "richy_jr_2000" > > <richy_jr_2000@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I tallied up the nominations, and have finally created a poll > > for Most > > > > > Influential Cuber. Sorry for the gigantic delay in doing > > this. Have > > > > > fun! > > > > > > > > > > http://www.geocities.com/rubiks_galaxia/poll.html > > > > > > > > > > -Richard Patterson > > > > > richy_jr_2000@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity - wouldn't Erno Rubik be the most > > influential cuber? After all if he > > > > hadn't cubed arguably nobody else on this group would have. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
