So, Should we wait for this feature in the next version? Regards
----- Original Message ----- From: "Duncan Sands" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 12:05 PM Subject: [speedtouch] Re: ATM loopback > When I use the "speedtch" kernel module. It links to the "atm" module. > In my view, OAM support should be included in the "atm" module, then it > will automatically work for all low level usb DSL modems, i.e. put the > OAM handling code in one place, instead of duplicate it all over the place. > > As it does not appear to be in the "atm" module, then someone should add it. > We should NOT respond to any OAM cells unless we know how to handle ATM. > The "speedtch" should not need to know much, if any about ATM, and just > pass the data to the "atm" module to handle. > > BUT, as the current "speedtch" seems to be lumping AAL5 cells into > single AAL5 frames before sending them on (probably for performance > reasons) we might have to add OAM support into the "speedtch" module. I agree. Ciao, Duncan. PS: I have asked for advice on the linux-ATM mailing list (I forgot to CC this list - sorry about that). Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se d�sinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se d�sinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
