On Thu, 11 May 2006, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> > In my opinion, the example policy should be:
> >
> > "v=spf1 mx a:pluto.example.net ?include:gmail.com -all"
> >
> > Despite the prominent disclaimer about using the example as an
> > actual policy, using the more realistic, though just as simple, policy
> > is better. The drawback is then having to briefly describe '?'.
>
> Can you (or someone else) suggest a _brief_ description of "?include:gmail.
> com" to replace the current description of "include:gmail.com"?
everything authorized by gmail.com is possibly legitimate for example.net, too
everything authorized by gmail.com is not considered unauthorized for
example.net
--
Stuart D. Gathman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
