-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On 05/15/2006 16:05, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > Outlook Express (and as far as I can tell Outlook, although I don't > > have a copy to test) can't do SMTP AUTH in any useful way. > > Thunderbird 1.5.0.2, for the record, works out of the box with either > > STARTTLS, secure password, or both. > > I still have a windows box with those installed. I can test if you want > held. According to "The Book of Postfix", both support draft 10 of the > SMTP Auth spec, not the final. They are looking for AUTH=, not AUTH. > For Postfix you need to use broken_sasl_auth_clients=yes. > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#broken_sasl_auth_clients
That would explain why it works with my MSA, which runs Courier, which supports the obsolete "AUTH=" SMTP extension: | io:~> telnet io 25 | Trying 2001:608:5::2... | Connected to io.link-m.de. | Escape character is '^]'. | 220 io.link-m.de ESMTP | EHLO io.link-m.de | 250-io.link-m.de Ok. | 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 | 250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 X-NETSCAPE-HAS-BUGS | 250-STARTTLS | ... | 250 DSN | QUIT | 221 Bye. | Connection closed by foreign host. > For OE, you need to do port wrapping. Why would you need to do port wrapping? Sorry, I don't get it. My OE 5.5 does SMTPS over port 465 just fine. Or did you mean STARTTLS? > I don't know if you can make Outlook to STARTTLS. At least not with versions up to 2000. I never tried anything newer. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEaOzswL7PKlBZWjsRAv/lAJ462H0wXwXKFqijn5eHizvQ3pMq0wCfXuJW CJ+x52hTMFJ77vF+wPZx9eY= =e12U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
