On Sunday 11 June 2006 16:24, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I got my first complaint today that my validator didn't do IPv6.  Maybe
> > we need to focus on this more...
>
> Pyspf should parse ip6 just fine.  The mechanism simply never matches, on
> the assumption that the MTA is ip4 only.
>
> Has a bug crept in?

"Results - PermError SPF Permanent Error: Too many :. Not allowed in domain 
name.: ip6:2001:0718:0002::0/50"

I think I did that recently.  I don't think it's in your code.  

Scott K

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to