On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:56:36 -0600 "Steve Yates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Scott Kitterman <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Friday, December >01, 2006 7:36 AM: > >> I've been considering doing something like this. If I did, I would >reject >> the message and send the results with the 550. This would avoid the >> backscatter risk. > > Hmm, that would be nice. But, wouldn't it have to be your >program accepting mail (directly, or a milter, or...)? Perhaps a new >domain like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and then have that MX point to your >program.
Yes. It would be easy to add to the Postfix policy daemon I already run on my MTAs. It's just a matter of getting a few hours to implement and test it. If the project wanted to set up something like [EMAIL PROTECTED], I could be the MX for it. Scott K ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1996
