On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:48, Steve Yates wrote: > Scott Kitterman <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sunday, December > > 03, 2006 10:38 PM: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and your message will be rejected with the SPF > > results > > > for both Mail From and HELO checks. > > Great! Good, cheap, *and* on time. :) This should eventually > be on the site and/or in the FAQ, with an emphasis on the "will be > rejected" part. The first part of the reply actually threw me for a > second until my brain caught up with my eyeballs.
How's this (feel free to edit): http://new.openspf.orgTools > Would it be possible to include the SPF record found and used > for the test? That way hopefully people will realize if an old record > is being cached. I worry about getting the SMTP rejection to long. We discussed this on IRC today and what I'd like to do is have this pointed to the upgraded why? page once Julian gets Mail::SPF working for that. The current why?, like the wizard, needs some renovation before I'd consider it suitable. > -------- > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/3/2006 10:40 PM > You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For > assistance, contact your system administrator. > < teamits102.teamits.net #5.7.1 SMTP; 550 5.7.1 Note that all the stuff above here is added by your MTA. Stuff below here is what I send back with the 550: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected: SPF Tests: Mail-From > Result="pass": Mail From="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" HELO > name="teamits102.teamits.net" HELO Result="pass" Remote > IP="204.200.196.170"> Scott K ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1996
