Hi Georg, Looks like you made it through exams and are hard back at work on Sphinx. Is there any chance the feature discussed below can make it into 0.5? Do I need to log it somewhere else as a feature request?
Bob On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bob Tolbert schrieb: >> I'd like to offer a suggestion for an enhancement to cmdoption. I find >> that I need to document multiple, small programs in the same document. >> And many of them have a common option like "-in". >> >> The current method will cause a clash if the two are defined in the >> same .rst file. Fine, I can put them in separate files, but when it >> comes time to reference or index these options, they don't work as >> expected. >> >> I'd like to suggest an additional keyword, much like ".. module::", >> say ".. program:: foo" that sets the "current" program that all >> options are members of. Then references could be :option:`foo-in` >> instead of just :option:`-in`. This will remove the ambiguity. And if >> the "..program:: foo" is never set, then the current behavior is >> unchanged. > > This is a good idea. I will try to implement it in Sphinx 0.5. > > Georg > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
