Thanks for finding that bug Paul!

And yes, there is a ton of functionality in the Numpy stuff.  I wanted
a good base to build from, and a clean slate to pull in intelligible
numpy stuff.

> - Hooking autosummary into the same "autodoc-process-docstring"
>   and "autodoc-process-signature" signal as sphinx.ext.autodoc
>   would be nice.

Can you explain what you mean a little more by this.

>
> - I'd recommend retaining the signature formatting functionality -- it's
>   probably generally useful. Though maybe the function signatures
>   shouldn't be on by default.
>
I have been debating this a bit, and I think the "right" way to handle
this is to add it as a feature for sphinx-autodoc.  For the default
autosummary, i want to just provide links for the user to click.  I
think the "right" way to handle this is to provide a "sub" directive
to autosummary called :signature: or something, similar to
how :autoclass: works.


> - There's presently an error on line 222 in autosummary/__init__.py,
>   variable "title" is undefined, but maybe this part is still under
>   refactoring.

fixed.

Let me know if you want the "push" bit ;-).  I miss saying "commit
bit", maybe we should compromise and call it the push bush?  Nah...

cheers.
-chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sphinx-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to sphinx-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to