Gour schrieb: > Hi! > > I was discussing with the person who works on migrating darcs manual > From latex to reST about the possibility to adopt Sphinx. > > He tried it and has several complaints which I'd like to address here to > find out if they can be resolved somehow... > > 1) In order to be able to use darcs' manual files with some other tool, > he wants it "to work with ..include and ..contents, rather then > REQUIRING ..toctree.". Is it possible to achieve it?
It is possible to use them, but you will run into a problem with 2) below. > 2) The present darcs manual was generated both as one big html file and > as split html-file. Is it possible "to make one HTML file per Nth > level heading, and name the file after the heading title, rather than > just creating foo.html for every foo.txt in the source." ? It would be possible to implement that, but it is not possible at the moment. It won't be a priority of mine though. > The following two 'annoyances' are not so important, but I'll still > mention them... > > 3) "I want it to stop using recursive makefiles for PDF and PS > rendering." and What would be the alternative? > 4) "I want it to work without needing to have a conf file in the source > tree -- currently it needs an empty conf file even if you use -D" I've added that (using -C switch) in tip. > Any feedback is appreciated. > > I really like Sphinx and will use it for my project(s), but would like > to see it adopted for Darcs as well... cheers, Georg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to sphinx-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
