On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Roger Binns <[email protected]> wrote: > A nice simplification is if we could write `foo.bar.bam` without the > leading :meth:, :attr: etc.
I think that'd be brilliant. I'd love to see Sphinx just make a "best guess"; if it's wrong the author could always clarify by using an explicit reference in the current style. > As for the item being referenced (eg > django.contrib.comments.models.Comment.save), only enough of it to be > unambiguous is needed. Again, you read my mind -- this is exactly what I want. So: if I hack up a patch, is there a chance it'll get merged back upstream? Jacob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
