On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 01:38:24PM +0100, Georg Brandl wrote: > > anita kean schrieb: > > > > My real problem is literalincludes of code in > > a directory tree - as I understand it, filenames given > > to literalincludes must be relative to the calling file. > > > > ... > > Can literalincludes be made relative to the base directory > > of the project (directory of conf.py e.g.) or > > some other set of possible search paths provided to conf.py? > > > > i.e. I don't want to use relative paths for files in literalincludes, > > and I'd like to keep code structure separate from documentation > > structure. > > That is a valid request. Only a while ago, I enabled absolute paths > for images, and don't see why they shouldn't be enabled for includes > (and downloads) also. > > I've implemented this now in trunk. > Thanks so much, Georg!
Anita --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
