Dear Günter, On 23 Jun., 10:23, Guenter Milde <[email protected]> wrote: > These are backlinks, it seems like you have 3 references to [Pham].
Yes. > > And [Wilkerson] is a link to the first of these anchors (although > > above I did not write [Wilkerson]_, so it should not be a link). > > It should. It's a backlink as well. > > This is documented in > http://docutils.sf.net/docutils/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#ci... Sorry, but the link seems to be broken. Best regards, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
