Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de> wrote: > On 2010-04-07, Kevin Horn wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.berlios.de>wrote: > >> On 2010-04-03, J Carlos Cardona wrote: > >> > On 29 mar, 01:28, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de> wrote: > > >> No. Sphinx does not depend on Docutils but forked from it.
Günter, I'm surprised that you're making such uninformed statements. Sphinx is not intended as a replacement for docutils, and it does not try to make docutils obsolete. You should know that by now. Otherwise, don't you think I wouldn't have bothered porting docutils to Python 3 or contributing back speedup patches? > > According to Sphinx's setup.py, Sphinx depends on docutils >= 0.4. > > OK, so it might still use parts of Docutils. However, the latex writer > is a fork from 0.4 or 0.5 that misses many of the recent enhancements > and bugfixes. Also, as Sphinx processes a tree of documents, some of > the internal processing stages are different. Correct. Sphinx builds upon docutils, and uses as much of docutils as possible, with the LaTeX writer being the only exception (and I've often enough acknowledged that a sync is in order.) cheers, Georg -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to sphinx-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sphinx-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
