Hi Roberto, Any compelling reason to use rst2pdf over LaTeX? The rst2pdf version of Sphinx manual found on the homepage looks much less attractive (from a typographic standpoint) than its counterpart created with LaTeX. If there are advantages I would be please to hear.
On Apr 8, 4:49 pm, Roberto Alsina <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 08 April 2010 11:37:18 Alpha Zo wrote: > > > COOL! It works now. By just replacing pos_market.pdf by pos_maket.* > > and using your tip, the PNG has been automatically generated and > > placed into the right _build\html\_images while Latex output uses the > > original PDF figure. > > > This is official now, I'm switching to Sphinx ;) and I've already > > started converting other fellows at my workplace for technical > > documentations (not Python related though). > > > Again, thank you very much your valuable support. > > Ok, now I have to convince you to use rst2pdf instead of latex and I'm done > for the day ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
