On 2010-12-12, dhyams wrote:
> Thank you both for your input...I have actually combined both and
> things do what they should.
> I thought originally that the problem was the image in conjunction
> with the table was causing problems. As it turns out, however, it was
> just the image itself that was causing problems. Perhaps incorrect
> DPI, I'm not sure...but anyway, I think that there is a problem in
> sphinx itself. If I put the following in my rst file and compile
> latex:
> .. image:: _static/icon.png
> :width: 1in
> :height: 1in
> I get this in the output latex:
> \includegraphics[width=1in,height=1in]{icon.png}
> But if I put this:
>
> .. image:: _static/icon.png
> :width: 16px
> :height: 16px
>
> I only get this in the output latex:
>
> \includegraphics{icon.png}
>
> As you can see, the sizes are ignored. Is this expected behavior?
No.
With Docutils' rst2latex, you I get the expected::
\includegraphics[height=16px,width=16px]{_static/icon.png}
One more reason to use the upstream LaTeX writer also in Sphinx...
Günter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to sphinx-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sphinx-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
