On 2011-10-25, Andrea Crotti wrote: > I'm fighting a little bit in trying to understand parsed-literal.
... > This block of code for example is recognised and colored perfectly: ... > I thought it was just an highlighting problem, but it's just not seen > as a parsed-literal. What does the output look like? Is there an error message? Does a blank line between the directive start line and the content block help? Try to create a minimal working example: copy the "failing" block to a new document. Remove stepwise content and try which line/part changes the behaviour. > What can I be missing? Parsed literal is parsed as *reStructuredTeXt*. See http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#parsed-literal-block Günter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to sphinx-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sphinx-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.