Thanks for looking. And ... I think it would make a lot of sense to define figures in substitutions.
Joaquim Quinta-feira, 23 de Maio de 2013 16:35:28 UTC+1, Guenter Milde escreveu: > > On 2013-05-23, J Luis wrote: > > > Sorry, I have another problem. For a question of organization for cmake > > build we would like to have the figure directives declared as macros in > an > > external file. That file would than be included by the main rst file. > > However, I just faced the fact that I can define macros for images but > not > > for figures. That is, I can declare this and refer to it normally as > |Fig1| > > in the text. > > > .. |Fig1| image:: fig.jpg > > > but I can't do > > > .. |Fig1| figure:: fig.jpg > > > Well, I can do but it wont build. Real case error > > > source/figs_Cookbook.rst_:1: WARNING: Substitution definition > > "Fig-GMT5_Summit" empty or invalid. > > > Can't figures really be called from macros? > > The documentation__ is not explicit on the implemented directives for > substitutions. However, it says: > > Substitution definitions allow the power and flexibility of block-level > directives to be shared by inline text. > > A figure is an image with heading. In contrast to an image, a figure > cannot > be an inline element, hence it does not make sense to define it as a > substitution. > > __ > http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#substitution-definitions > > > Günter > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-users?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
