Luc's response is correct. To make this easier, I use different extensions for "files that get included" and "files that are included in the toc," just so that Sphinx (and my own integration) makes it all correct.
On Friday, February 14 2014, 06:20:30, Jelke v. Hoorn wrote: > Hi, > > I have a lot of small rst files which are includes for example by: > > .. toctree:: > :glob: > foo/* > > as the contents of these files are small the resulting html consists of a > lot of small pages. > I would like to have the options to specify in the toc tree that the html > builder (or any builder that creates separate linked output files) should > include the contents of named files instead of linking to them. Something > like: > > .. toctree:: > :glob: > :include: > foo/* > > > I can't find such option, when it is not available i would like to request > this feature :) > > I understand this is not straight forward as the relative paths are > different and these should be accounted for. > Lets say there is a foo/bar.rst which links to foo/bar.xml by > > .. include:: bar.xml > > which would be > > .. include:: foo/bar.xml > > when bar.rst was included by an include directive instead of the toctree. > > > Kind regards, > Jelke van Hoorn -- Sam Kleinman (tychoish): - [email protected] - tychoish <http://tychoish.com/> "don't get it right, get it written" -- james thurber -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
