I've forwarded these to Andrew, with my signoff and updated comments. You still need to work on having your patch descriptions match up to what the patches actually do...
Patches 3-5 in this series seem to have a common thread: waiting until BIT_STAT_SPIF is set before moving to the next step of the transfer. Next time something similar happens, I'd rather see just one patch addressing the issue on all code paths ... not three small patches that only fix it for a few of the code paths. Also, two of those three patches describe their updates as fixing a "regression", or "reverting" the code. Was this a bug that came in those patches you wanted to merge to 2.6.24? If so, shouldn't those regression fixes go into the stable series? - Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
