On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:34:46 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In that case, I think the best fix is to let NPCS0 stay selected > permanently in MR and overwrite CSR0 with to the new slave's settings > before asserting CS. But that's a more complicated change, and I don't > know how it will affect the AT91RM9200 special cases. > > So I suggest we merge your patch for 2.6.25, and try to optimize it > for 2.6.26.
I absolutely agree. > David, do you want me to pass on the patch with my signoff or just ask > Andrew to add my Acked-by to the patch already in mm? The patch in mm also lacks my Signed-off line. I had thought Andrew never take a patch without Signed-off line ;) Should I resend my patch with my Signed-off and Haavard's Acked-by? --- Atsushi Nemoto ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
