On Wed, 21 May 2008 11:04:38 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Definitely agreed that it makes sense to put DACs and ADCs in the same > general place and obviously there are plenty of devices out there that do > both.
Note that hardware monitoring chips can include ADCs and DACs: the former to monitor system voltages, and the later to control fans (most chips use PWM for that but a few use DACs.) ADCs and DACs are, much like GPIOs, usable for a variety of different purposes. I doubt that there would be any benefit in abstracting DACs and ADCs the way we did for GPIOs, but the important point here is that we really want to group the drivers according to their functionality and not technical implementation details. -- Jean Delvare ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
