On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:25 PM, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Since the last submission we are also using the spi subsystem and
>> pxa2xx-spi instead of ssp.c directly as before.
>
> I took a quick glance at this and it seemed like it should be
> able to build without depending on PXA ... should certainly
> not include <mach/ssp.h> or <mach/regs-ssp.h>, and it doesn't
> look like it needs PXA-specific stuff like <mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
> either.
>
> It's also worth removing the reverse dependencies ("select X")
> from Kconfig; they don't work very well for the things which
> those dependencies rely on.
>
> - Dave
>I'm wondering if it call fall into the regulator framework, along with a hwmon driver with its attributes being exported by sysfs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
