On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 06:25:51PM +0300, Igor Grinberg wrote: > On 06/30/11 17:45, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > from this thread. Without it, ADS7846 does not work on spitz (ADS7846 > > does not have any dedicated regulator there). I want to > > add .needs_regulator bool to ads7846.c and send the patch again to the > > list. > Please, don't... > I thought we've finished discussing the regulator issue... > Instead of patching the driver and the platform data and the board file, > you should do _either_ of the following: > 1) add regulator definition for ads7846 into the board file > 2) enable the CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY in your kernel configuration > 3) use regulator_use_dummy_regulator() call in the board file. > Using either of the above, you will not need the patch for ads7846, only for > the board file. Yes, we've been through this repeatedly. None of these options take any appreciable time to implement, it'd be much more productive to just do so. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
