Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:51:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > >>>>> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[email protected]> writes: > > > > >> Great, will you handle the series or should it go through the spi tree? > > > > Grant> With the big spi driver rename, it should probably either go via the > > Grant> spi tree, or be put into a topic branch that can be merged by both the > > Grant> spi and samsung trees. > > > > Both is fine by me. Let me know if you want me to do something. > > It's pretty minimal arch/arm impact, and it depends on the big rename > patch, so why don't I just merge it directly into spi/next without a > topic branch.
Hi Grant, I agree with you, it is not expected this makes some conflicts between spi and samsung tree. I think Ben's ack is enough on this, if required, Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
