Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:08:55PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Grant, Jassi and all, > > > > > > I will apply these 1 and 2 in my -fix tree for 3.0 with your acks. > > > > > Oops, this needs previous 'cleanup spi platform specific code' so can't > > apply -fix tree now. > > There may also be conflicts with the heavy rework in the spi tree. > Kgene, when you pick up this series, can you put it into a separate > topic branch and merge that into your main tree? That way if there > are difficult conflicts, then I can also merge that same topic branch > into spi/next to resolve them. > Hi Grant,
Sure, no problem. I'm waiting for Padmavathi's new patch which is based on old code not new SPI code. When I merge topic branch for this into my tree, let you know immediately. Then if any problems, let's talk again :) Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
