On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:19:09PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:52:43PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> > index 8ac6542..fa594d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> > @@ -786,9 +786,11 @@ static int __devinit spi_imx_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
> > if (cs_gpio < 0)
> > cs_gpio = mxc_platform_info->chipselect[i];
> > +
> > + spi_imx->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;
> > if (cs_gpio < 0)
> > continue;
> > - spi_imx->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;
> > +
> > ret = gpio_request(spi_imx->chipselect[i], DRIVER_NAME);
> > if (ret) {
> > while (i > 0) {
> Having said that I wonder how to specify to use an internal chipselect
> via DT?
It would be done with a blank gpio specifier which is supported by the GPIO
binding.
g.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
