>> lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/4/125 (0/2: description of the work) >> lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/4/126 (1/2: turn the if plethora to table lookup) >> lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/4/127 (2/2: partial split to type-specific files). > > Splitting this up doesn't look like a silly idea -- I thought it was > unfortunate to have to patch a core file just to add a bus type. > > I guess the question is how many new buses we get over time.
Well, CERN will have 2 in a short time. And I'm sure the bus concept is so good that a number of them exists as external patches. Being forced to patch a core file is not good, with conflicts that accumulate over time. I'd better be able to drop in my own file and add a kconfig-aware line in Makefile. I think the implementation is straightforward. Who should I send it to? thanks /alessandro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
