Hi Shubhrajyoti
Le mardi 22 novembre 2011 09:26:07, Shubhrajyoti Datta a écrit :
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
wrote:
[snip]
> > + bs->irq = irq;
> > + bs->clk = clk;
> > + bs->fifo_size = pdata->fifo_size;
> > +
> > + ret = request_irq(irq, bcm63xx_spi_interrupt, 0, pdev->name,
> > master); + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "unable to request irq\n");
> > + goto out_unmap;
> > + }
>
> Could this be a threaded irq ?
I see no reasons why it could not. Is this a requirement for accepting new
drivers? I see no drivers doing this in Grant's spi/next branch.
>
> > +
> > + master->bus_num = pdata->bus_num;
> > + master->num_chipselect = pdata->num_chipselect;
> > + master->setup = bcm63xx_spi_setup;
> > + master->transfer = bcm63xx_transfer;
> > + bs->speed_hz = pdata->speed_hz;
> > + bs->stopping = 0;
> > + bs->tx_io = (u8 *)(bs->regs + bcm63xx_spireg(SPI_MSG_DATA));
> > + bs->rx_io = (const u8 *)(bs->regs + bcm63xx_spireg(SPI_RX_DATA));
> > + spin_lock_init(&bs->lock);
> > +
> > + /* Initialize hardware */
> > + clk_enable(bs->clk);
> > + bcm_spi_writeb(bs, SPI_INTR_CLEAR_ALL, SPI_INT_STATUS);
> > +
> > + /* register and we are done */
> > + ret = spi_register_master(master);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "spi register failed\n");
> > + goto out_reset_hw;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_info(dev, "at 0x%08x (irq %d, FIFOs size %d) v%s\n",
> > + r->start, irq, bs->fifo_size, DRV_VER);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +out_reset_hw:
> > + clk_disable(clk);
> > + free_irq(irq, master);
> > +out_unmap:
> > + iounmap(bs->regs);
> > +out_put_master:
> > + spi_master_put(master);
> > +out_free:
> > + clk_put(clk);
> > +out:
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __exit bcm63xx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct spi_master *master = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct bcm63xx_spi *bs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> > + struct resource *r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > 0); +
> > + /* reset spi block */
> > + bcm_spi_writeb(bs, 0, SPI_INT_MASK);
> > + spin_lock(&bs->lock);
> > + bs->stopping = 1;
> > +
> > + /* HW shutdown */
> > + clk_disable(bs->clk);
> > + clk_put(bs->clk);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock(&bs->lock);
> > +
> > + free_irq(bs->irq, master);
> > + iounmap(bs->regs);
> > + release_mem_region(r->start, r->end - r->start);
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, 0);
> > + spi_unregister_master(master);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +static int bcm63xx_spi_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > pm_message_t mesg) +{
> > + struct spi_master *master = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct bcm63xx_spi *bs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> > +
> > + clk_disable(bs->clk);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bcm63xx_spi_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct spi_master *master = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct bcm63xx_spi *bs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> > +
> > + clk_enable(bs->clk);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +#define bcm63xx_spi_suspend NULL
> > +#define bcm63xx_spi_resume NULL
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver bcm63xx_spi_driver = {
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "bcm63xx-spi",
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + },
> > + .probe = bcm63xx_spi_probe,
> > + .remove = __exit_p(bcm63xx_spi_remove),
> > + .suspend = bcm63xx_spi_suspend,
> > + .resume = bcm63xx_spi_resume,
>
> Could we move to dev pm ops?
Sure, I have fixed that in version 2 of the patch.
--
Florian
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
