On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Linus, >> The latter should be: >> >> struct device *dev = master->dev; >> >> Just my €0.01... > > I agree with you, that was my initial approach as well. However, it changes > the parent-child relationships and might break applications relying on that > relationship in sysfs for instance. Would that be acceptable ?
In my experience people use the /sys/class/* interfaces and don't traverse hierarchies much. But I'm not to speak about such things... I would have put the patch in and see if somebody screams ... Linus Walleij ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
