On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Rabin Vincent <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 00:52, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote: >> Combined with the PL022 patch this causes a power regression since >> the PL022 is hereafter always on. > > How can there be a "power regression" here? This is the only user of > the vcore regulator, and, apart from the fact that its disable routine > only decrements an essentialy write-only variable, it is shared which > several devices which already never disable it.
Yes true... Hm I hope something else in mainline will increase refcount to vape so it's not disabled at regulator_has_full_constraints()? Better test it, then I'll see. Mark: as Rabin says the v1 patch is probably fine, are you pushing this to ARM SoC or into Russell's patch tracker? Yours, Linus Walleij ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
