On 10 May 2012 00:47, Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:39:29AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> On 9 May 2012 22:32, Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>
>> > Yeah, I know.  I'm saying we should try to come up with a binding for
>> > this that can be used by new SPI contollers going forward so things are
>> > consistent.
>
>> Ok. For this patch series, I will continue with the samsung specific
>> binding for the nCS line.
>
> How about just renaming your binding to a generic one and documenting it
> separately?  It looks like a sensible binding which other people should
> be able to use so may as well have something there already.

Ok. I will replace the samsung specific binding with a generic binding
in the next version of this patch series.

Thanks,
Thomas.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general

Reply via email to